That would be a matter of opinion. If it has been 4473'd to you, it is not the "property" of the 07 and would not need to be marked if you, the person, built it up. But some IOI's and agents *might* take the position that you the individual and you the SP 07 are one and the same and thus pitch a fit if there was not a marking. I would tend to err on the side of conservative caution and mark the receiver in such a case.
Jeff Folloder
NFATCA Executive Director
www.nfatca.org
With that interpretation, if an SP-07 had a receiver in personal (4473'd) possession and assembled it at home (or any place not the licensed premise for the business), they would be in violation as well -- no?Originally Posted by ExecDirector
Additionally, that would suggest that were an SP-07 at a shooting match and had trigger parts go bad on a personal AR-15, they couldn't legally switch them out even though every other non SP-07 competitor could (or do a barrel swap at a belt-fed match, etc. etc.).
That would also likely extend to helping out a fellow competitor for no charge (e.g. you're intending the act as an individual and not as an FFL holder).
In all seriousness, where does the crazy stop?
Last edited by sillycon; 01-02-2014 at 09:01 PM.
SillyCon,
Where does the crazy stop?
That is an easy one. It stops when there are so many laws in various jurisdictions, so many vague, constantly changing regulations, required permits, licenses, registrations, taxes and audits that compliance with them is virtually impossible and the penality for non-compliance so strict and harsh that no one will attempt it in the first place.
That way, they never restricted your right to keep and bear arms, you just decide it is not worth your time, money or risk of punishment for accidental non-compliance.
I hope that cleared things up for you.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote