Search:

The opinions expressed by Mr. Prince and echoed by Mr. Codrea are just that: opinions. They are drawing conclusions based upon their own personal selection of facts and do not tell the whole story....

And now they have stripped the filibuster from the Senate. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

That is partner in the business sense. They are addressing sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, etc. You must have at least one responsible party in an FFL. Somebody who will be... responsible...

And it's nearly impossible to codify something like "all grantors" are responsible persons because that may not necessarily be so! A grantor may or may not have possesory or financial control,...

I used the term "vouchsafe" in quotes because that is the role that responsible person(s) fulfill within an FFL enterprise.

I go out and apply for an FFL. In so doing, I have to designate on the...

Primary responsible party, person or persons... Just like the FFL system.

Again, to keep it in line with a process that ATF is already familiar with: FFL's. And we did advocate for NICS at delivery time... along with making ATF clarify exactly how that would work with...

Nope. And the definition varies from state to state. Beneficiaries may or may not be responsible persons (or even eligible to possess at a given point in time). And trustees may or may not, depending...

Just the responsible party. Not everyone. A process identical to the FFL system. An FFL can have 100 employees, but must have one or more responsible parties.

Doing a NICS check on pick up is...

http://www.nfatca.org/pubs/NFATCA_Statement_083113.pdf

While it may appear to some on the Internet that the NFATCA has "thrown folks under the bus," this is simply not the case.