Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: NFATCA Official Statement on Presidential Action

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    10
    What about Petition 1209 (PDF)?

    This part of the PDF gives me worry. I have my entire family on my trust. If a family of 6 gets 10 stamps then that's 60 sets of fingerprints and photos. That is a lot of hoops to go through which will "unduly burden the law abiding public, will restrain lawful commerce."

    We request that
    • 479.63 and 479.85 be amended to require photographs and fingerprints of persons responsible for directing the legal entity;
    Keep in mind I'd support low resistance measures like a NICS check. Or even fingerprints in states that don't keep up their NICS database (as long as fingerprints are good for a while). But in the day and age where oil filter suppressors are sold on ebay and commonly displayed on YouTube I don't see much of a point in the repeated fingerprinting of all trust members. Substitution costs are way to low for criminals. That is unless the whole point of your actions is to protect the purity of NFA and not really reduce crime.
    Last edited by LeonR; 11-17-2013 at 03:38 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •